If NFTs profit ...

The legal basis of NFTs is a difficult problem to solve. On the one hand, anything can be NFT, its usable application is global, and all types of NFT can be available. The law itself has a jet lag, so short-term sex is hard to resist.

the author triedno moneyIf you want to look at NFTs from a new angle, just chat, don't jump to conclusions, present new ideas to all partners working on NFTs.

Can NFTs be considered legitimate devices?

The rise of NFT is very close to the metaverse. The metaverse creates a well-understood and realistic virtual environment, and the NFT is integral to distinguishing the individual player as a digital asset that cannot be replicated again. When a user purchases an NFT, it establishes a one-to-one relationship with the NFT, enters a locked "bag", and becomes the virtual property of the user.

As legitimate property, it must have three characteristics: effective, insufficient and legal.

In terms of usability, NFTs benefit users in a unique metaverse way and can fulfill their spiritual needs and desires.

Insufficiently, the acquisition of NFTs has been received by users via fiat currency rather than corporate distribution, and users could not be judged accordingly as they are restricted by the laws of the virtual world. The virtual objects thus obtained are similar to those obtained by real work, and similar processes, but also by work processes which use reasonable working hours.

In terms of law, the legal community generally recognizes virtual goods and virtual game currency assets in online games, but the status of NFTs is not clearly defined and NFT markets are not considered to be. virtual money markets.

Therefore, the inheritance of NFTs should be considered first, and not intellectual property or the law. It is true that it is more effective to protect DFTs from the law, but both the products that can be chained and the products contained in the metaverse are based on possession or use. reality. We need to know that DFTs are property and are protected by law.

What does user authorization mean for NFT?

Although NFTs have grown in recent years and are of commercial interest, the ownership of consumer rights for NFTs remains unclear. Whether you are a trader or an individual, you can easily use NFTs for intermediary trades and other member trades. If it is found that he has violated article 9.24 and other provisions, there is a risk of falling under the criminal law.

The authors believe that the NFT industry is legal and compliant because it is easier to define relationships with consumers and NFTs based on higher revenue as members. First, if NFT use rights are defined as commercial rights using virtual devices, compliance risk is minimal under current law.

Right now, if you use fiat currency to buy NFT from a retailer, you can get a good NFT license by signing a sales contract between the platform and the consumer. .

In other words, the essence of the NFT license exchange at the moment is the agreement between the parties that the user promised to conclude the transaction for a single specialization and a single digital write. Click to buy) Under the agreement, he will become a member of NFT. For the important reason that there is no NFT domain currently available in China, exchange transactions are more like exchange permits than membership.

NFT stands for Second Amendment to the Real Estate Act

Although there are not many rules governing metaverse and NFTs in our country today, the cause of second NFT changes would often be governed by the existing rules if there were no rules, this which may result in penalties and penalties. Use continuous translation. In such situations, companies must prevent and manage the capital risks posed by the DTV industry and interpret these policies as applicable to reduce risk.

At the same time, the concept of the rule of law can better protect the intellectual property rights of virtual objects on the chain. Through blockchain authentication and smart agreement approvals and administrative procedures, it is able to protect the legal rights and interests of the parties, while protecting the privacy of the perpetrator of torture.

Of course, in the real situation, since the user has NFT, it can be seen as a situation where part of the rules allows the user more than the members accordingly. These user rights include the right to own, use and benefit from virtual devices, that's why the developer NFT has changed these rights for users so that users use virtual objects on the metaverse for a reason any. for advertisers to take advantage of.

finally write

In the new face, all legitimate organizations are researching, and the thoughts and feelings of the authors today are to discuss education, not the end of NFT. In terms of usufruct, there is the disadvantage of assigning more rights and heavy responsibilities to the platform.

At the same time, according to the law on property rights, new forms of expenditure cannot be created without clear legislation in our national law. However, the authors hope to create a larger meeting space for NFTs and other blockchain devices by providing a different voice.