The bombardment of Ponzi schemes and the protection of the environment in the public opinion! Mozilla announced today that it should not be providing cryptocurrency.

The Mozilla Foundation, a nonprofit that promotes the open browser Firefox, announced on Twitter on the 1st that it had received free cryptocurrency.

The Mozilla Foundation recently announced its intention and intention to ban cryptocurrency for self-supporting users and the outside world in a variety of tweets today. We will then accept the community's recommendations and take action as they listen and discuss our environmental impact.

Although the Mozilla Foundation says that "the continued use of technology is still an important area to explore," a lot has changed since it started accepting crypto donations.

This is why Mozilla said: Starting today, we will be reviewing whether the cryptocurrency donation disclosure policy is in line with the security growth goals. In the meantime, we must abandon the supply of cryptocurrency.

The Open Souls Advocate Mozilla Foundation finally said: In the spirit of open space, all of this will be transparent and will be updated and shared regularly. We look forward to discussing it again and thank the community for reporting it.

Accepting Dogecoin as a payment method, shame on participants

According to the report, the Mozilla Foundation said in a tweet on the 1st that it had received cryptocurrency donations and was able to accept cryptocurrency donations through Bitpay.

Among them, a tweet so far, Mozilla co-founder Jamie Zawinski said that everyone involved in the operation should be ashamed of working with Ponzi scammers who are burning and harming the world.

In addition to Zawinski, @plinss, the creator of Gecko, who developed the Firefox runtime engine, ruthlessly said he was 100% in favor of Zawonski's idea. The reputation you have built for yourself over the years for expanding your donation space will be buried in nothingness, and the reputation is not easy to rebuild.

Mozilla quickly released the data to prevent bleeding. Although its starting point is the goal of improving security, it cannot avoid damaging the reputation of the technology and its loyal users. , and the frustration of community leaders with public opinion.