The rise of new chains means design improvements in many ways going forward

At this point, it's clear that the future is more of a chain. Two years ago we saw an increase in standard blockchains 1. theseOption L1Many of them (altcoins on a single layer network) have been called Ethereum killers, but rumors of Ethereum's death have grown too numerous. Ethereum is also the # 1 smart blockchain contract. Most of the innovative, non-BTC investments are in Ethereum, which is unlikely to change.

Eth has already negotiated certain markets for its competitors, notably Sol, Luna and Avax.

But let's go back a bit and go back to the BSC era. BSC provides a platform for users who are new to cryptocurrencies to transact quickly and cheaply. New cryptocurrency users will be introduced to the magic of blockchain money. This means that you can borrow, earn money, and use dex. After all, the BSC season ended with a stock market crash in May, but it was also due to the fact that BSC was rarely updated. Most of the operations are clones of the Ethereum protocol and there is a lot of wasted coins in the ecosystem. At the height of the BSC, TVL went from 31 billion to 12 billion and then again to 16 billion. Given the performance of other markets, it is hard to believe that BSC can now regain its peak of 21% TVL on all channels. This is a real number.

For use, Sol, Rune, and Avax are currently below 21% BSC when available. There are also commercial issues with the channel. I am not an expert here, but I remember reading that the nodes could not sync and hard blocks created every X seconds also failed. Overall, it turns out that speeding up Ethereum couldn't be easier. CornThe rise of Binance Smart Chain integrates Ethereum and includes the key elements that people want in a smart blockchain contract.

ETHThe only problem is the excessive cost for new users. As Vitalik Buterin said, "The Internet of Money shouldn't cost five cents on the exchange rate." The BSC series has proven that chains with low cost and adequate material (even clones) can be finished. There are also commercial issues with the channel. I'm not an expert here, but I remember reading that the nodes could not sync and hard blocks created every X seconds also failed. Overall, it turns out that speeding up Ethereum couldn't be easier. However, the rise of Binance Smart Chain has joined Ethereum's policy to understand the key elements that people need in a smart blockchain contract. The only problem with Eth is that it is too expensive for new users to use. Vitalik Buterin says:The Internet of Things shouldn't cost you 5 cents on exchange rates.. “The BSC season has proven that public channels can be finished with low cost and adequate materials (even clones).

So that brings us to today. In many ways, AVAX can be seen as a spiritual achievement for BSC, the EVM-enabled blockchain. It has a low cost and is a good product according to him. it is very goodshitcoin(Cottage Currency Ecosystem, Snow Bank and Wolf Game replication, and for performance because of shitcoin. This means that the product is useful in the chain. Otherwise, you can't use chains at first. (DONDE is the one to be a shame, because the dog is just a waist. It is a stable coin with a staining opponents. You can remove all the other things of your performance. It is very fast. It depends very quickly. It depends on the Sol is fast , is a computer. But there is a lot of things to do with a brush, but it's good, but it will change at the end and the item is still Most important is the type of data. I can also play games on brushing, and FTX and TSM sign recommendation is the main indicator of the SOL game of Solana. Also, the more stupid movement that only the bank can disappear if it does not have alcohol on encrypted currency and tradfi world. Finally, many new layers provide the most important service that allows users to build buildings / bridges. This helps attract these options and help keep the business weak at the Emperor Square. Many people need to add the ALut compared to the L1 EHE last year.

Overall, there are many public channels out there, and each public channel has its own set of recommendations that explain why users should use it. Now the question is, what is the best way to invest in various crypto ecosystem concepts? The easiest way is to buy the traditional symbols of all these chains and ask for them to be released in 5 years.

Personally, I am a huge fan of the home game. To connect all of these chains, you need something that can be used to transfer assets from one chain to another. This leads us to the bridge over the chain. Personally, I am a fan of Synapse. The cross-chain AMM is a real change. They have a good team. But here I think a bridge with good usability and innovation would be nice. I would like to bet on a bridge link that will work well in the future with the current market price / FDV (total diluted market value) / token market and other things in mind. Also keep in mind stats like all decks, percentage increases over the past X hours, and the number of channels available for decks.

The other thing that I find important is that blockchains can affect each other directly.IBC (Blockchain Interaction),Block communication, and other existing. Cosmos holds an offistic atom to block the chain. One of the current issues in e-mail (design) is to use a large technology of state sharing. In other words, all the market all people. (In the future, I think TANFANG would be moved to a chain that was especially used in variety of items, but the TANFQUs were hard to move to another place. Usually I don't There is a place.) Three times 99% of three times don't care about what others do in the block of chain. Then, if we have the crowd of chains for other purposes, each of these jobs is separated and these blocks can cooperate when needed. What should I do? It will be fine, that can be used using IBC. In addition, IBC can also be the same work as sent EPC-20 at the Square. But not it makes a branch? Then, if we have the crowd of chains for other purposes, each of these jobs is separated and these blocks can cooperate when needed. What should I do? It will be fine, that can be used using IBC. In addition, IBC can also be the same work as sent EPC-20 at the Square. But not the bridge? Then, if we have the crowd of chains for other purposes, each of these jobs is separated and these blocks can cooperate when needed. What should I do? It will be fine, that can be used using IBC. In addition, IBC can also be the same work as sent EPC-20 at the Square. But not the bridge?

The difference between IBC communication and the bridge is that the bridge is like a direct route between blockchains, while IBC is like a highway which can be used for any blockchain. It takes time and capital to build a separate bridge on each blockchain. IBCs allow a blockchain to be connected to other level 1 chains without having to build a bridge directly. So what is better? It depends on what you want. IBC is like a solution, and a straight bridge is like a highway. We believe that a first-class blockchain with sufficient interaction between partners will result in demand for direct connectivity. For some, I think there will eventually be an incentive to support their users, depending on the bridge race.

Detailed Forecast from Messari Report 2022: The most popular L1