What is Web3?

Web3 is a very fashionable period in 2021, commonly referred to as other financial cartoon characters (the avatar alludes to the big V in the financial world where the NFT cartoon is located) and the super V in the tech industry.

One of two lies that can be used to sidestep the critical thinking of LPs when increasing their first income in 2021, the other is the "meta-advantage". Congratulations. Now that you've learned the word buzz, you've got a good education and good luck.

Although today the marketing monopolists have announced many concepts without thinking about indoctrination of the market, no one can define what Web3 really is. It depends on what cycle you are in. Is Web3 a scam? Is web3 the future? Does web3 symbolize the world? Is Web3 no longer out of VC? Is Web3 just another name for cryptocurrency? You know what I mean. Even the cryptocurrency community cannot determine if Bitcoin is a 3 site.

Although no one agrees what web3 is and the word has become a buzzword over the past 6 months, we can conclude that web3 is not yet real. However, it is true that there are many ideas and experiences that continue to cycle in the merging process, and these ideas and experiences create inspiration, creativity, or complete depression in the observers.

What does Web3 mean?

If you don't want to deny that such an argument is pointless, consider whether Site 3 could be more effective. Need to reconfigure in web2? Or is there a particular problem that web3 needs to solve?

There are two points that seem important to me.

Decentralization of power - People increasingly doubt centralized power. Whether it is a government, a central bank, or an international omegatech company, they have become the strongest people in the country. Thoughts on decision-making, approval, and censorship have sparked new interest in creating reliable, non-invasive platforms that can support people and share fire patterns.

Owner Value - With the advent of Web2, the network has gone from "read" to "read and write". The website has become more social and engaging, and the days of user content have begun. Tech companies today own their users' content and then get paid for it themselves. They apply our passion for relationships, combine design, create publicity and exclude all potential clients for our clients. When he becomes a member of the company, it will be worth billions of dollars, and insiders will already benefit.

open and honest network

I understand the feelings of the supporters.

The best network in the future can solve these problems and make the most of the communication problems, as well as allow developers to develop well and keep the tools together in competition with the staff.

You can create a network that distributes users to create value and improve user experience. Most of the leaders in these tech-driven networks don't decide what we can talk about or how many ads we see on a daily basis.

It supports ordinary people who have worked thousands of hours on the batteries of large companies, and their care will be focused on the private sector.

Maybe the network can be more collaborative than stressful.

everything will be gone

Maybe I understand the fear of the critic.

A negative network in the future could be full of tokenized microtransactions, requiring rent for each user to make, and allowing users to "toaster" (commonly referred to as SCP-426; more, rather than project tokens). ) may require a project token. can be used. alone).

It could be a non-performing sale of network-based ERC20 for investors to deduct more direct costs than inactivity and annual sales.

It can be an unattended network unaffected by acts of violence such as child abuse or neglect. Online harassment has become difficult to prevent.

For example, a financier can only get good algorithmic hedge funds and giant level VCs that become big token owners in the crop.

Which direction to take?

If you can think of both the promise and the utopian future, I won't condemn what you think is your worst reality. Obviously, modern businesses often make the Internet more… boring. Authorization cookies, gdpr requests, banner ads, paywalls, capture games, skin and glass games or sell krypton gold games - it's easy to rely on the best or protect blocked user exchanges

And if you look at cryptocurrencies from the outside, they can't accuse you of seeing foreigners as scams. The benefits of wealth promote prosperity and pride in the business community, and the self-interest of cryptocurrency culture is alien to non-locals.

I understand. There is a reluctance to accept ideas that can be felt in theory because they are and sometimes still are bad. You don't have to work hard to figure out how to use a decentralized algorithm, and you don't have to research examples of people who have been used in token campaigns.

But at the same time, you don't have to look very far to see the strength of membership and the freedom that entrepreneurs still have.

Bitcoin went from “over-the-counter web accounts” to an asset repository in a fraction of a decade without central government help.

Ethereum has grown from a "Ponzi scheme of technology" to a large, multi-million dollar corporation every day.

Businesses, consumers and third parties have contributed and shared the rewards for creating value for money between these two networks. Anyone, not the developer or the fundraiser, can sign up and get a refund.

Even a visionary relationship like the DAO law can serve as an example of creating a productive environment shared by all. Although the competition for a copy of the Legislature was not successful, the DAO Legislature was more profitable, and this benefit was collected by the participants.

Perhaps this membership could become so important that the policies set by tech companies may or may not work.

differences

The disparity has worsened. House prices have skyrocketed as COVID-19 was ubiquitous and people with already high incomes got richer. At the same time, small businesses protested and offices ran out of money almost immediately. Obviously, over 50% of Americans have less than three months of fixed income.

Although wage growth has been slow, house prices have risen by over 400% over the past 40 years. People begin to feel the physical effects that are not good for them, and the future life they yearn for will soon be gone.

It is not surprising that the number of RobinHood retailers choosing Dogecoin traders and buyers is increasing. Lottery trading has become a great option for people unable to achieve their financial goals by saving and investing.

Perhaps a more intimate or standard token membership could serve as a momentous response to global income. Instead of forcing the state to give families money and taxes for future generations to pay for that generation, people can share the resources they create to build a world of justice.

When users vote with their wallets to choose companies that can give a giveaway for the value they have already been involved in, those companies can grow quickly and find great tools in a network that will result in staff cuts. Real people may choose to own some of the prizes they collect instead of giving them to developers and investors.

All other things being equal, users who offer two similar services are encouraged to use one of the services and get their money back.

a perfect idea

When Bitcoin was first created, it was another perfect idea. Satoshi Nakamoto gave what may turn out to be one of the most important historical events and gave it to the world of justice so that everyone can participate. They are not personally part of the tokens, and are not given to traders. They extract tokens on an equal basis with all participants. Yes, they've mined millions of tokens since they were the first participants, but they're no better than anyone who knows Bitcoin.

Once ETHereum was created, they pre-mined tokens and held competitive open and free ICOs. We sell 60,000,000 ETH to anyone who wants to register. Ethereum costs around US $ 0.30 per ETH. The creators of Ethereum have collected tokens for themselves and the Ethereum Foundation. V God, the founder of ETH, is also the largest beneficiary, owning less than 1% of all ETH equipment. It is a small fraction of the members compared to traditional products.

Ethereum's design is a bit 'fair for everyone' compared to Bitcoin, but still has a fair and open partnership model. Throughout 2017, ICOs repeated this pattern, but started to escalate with presales and private sales to insiders.

By 2018/19, the free and fair competition status of participants is a thing of the past. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) uses ICO programs to protect investors. Stress management and lack of transparency have led to the creation of private equity firms for private equity firms rather than for the public. It is not possible for people not to buy on the first cheap terms that VCs can buy now.

It can be unfortunate, warning of change by starting a fair network of free competitors without the developer paying for private sector venture capital funds distributed by multiple developers. . The purity and beauty created by Satoshi Nakamoto seem to have been polluted by greedy people.

But the truth is, cryptocurrencies are very popular now. When Bitcoin was first introduced, the fact that cryptocurrencies were of uncertain value to many. Bitcoin has proven to be very valuable. Ethereum supports this belief. Bitcoin's rise to power is only visible on the symbol's 10-year K-line, but it favors many venture capitalists.

When Satoshi Nakamoto launched Bitcoin, the difficulty of mining was minimal and people could mine 50 BTC block rewards with their own computer. The unknown nature of Bitcoin makes it not only a park of hedge funds, but a rich accumulation tool for enthusiasts. If the project were to start as it is today, those who already have income would receive all the hashes and collect all the tokens to pay for the electricity for their share of this new project. In this environment, manufacturers can also sell directly to secure long-term money.

I like to open everyone's eyes to the same word, but I understand that it's easier and often cheaper to engage with professional traders because manufacturers don't want to make custom rules the same. The abuse vectors of 2017 and most ICOs are going to zero, no.

Isn't it important if we can earn money to build the future?

No one can argue that V God is not entitled to 0.7% of ETH contribution due to its contribution to Ethereum. No one thinks Satoshi Nakamoto's million tokens have been misused.

However, it is incredible that the biggest sponsors of web3 are historically profitable entrepreneurs. Yes of course. These groups are trying to become the financial superfinancers of the industry that emerges from the perceived social integration of the world by buying much of the seed at a discount.

Plus, you can't ignore the financial producers and investors who use existing industries to build huge businesses that support each other.

So, I think the following four things are true:

People agree that those who deserve it should be rich and who deserve to be trusted when creating global prosperity.

There is a general consensus that venture capitalists or venture capitalists should start investing in something to provide services, and should benefit from it when they contribute to a profitable economy in the world.

Many believe these funds need to be open and fair, and oppose investors who have accepted the current rules and are patriarchal or skeptical (yes, right now). Here you can buy the best products from VCs!).

Everyone hates the creator or the investment to get rich off nothing in the world.

It is obvious that past attacks now exist in the cryptocurrency industry. Many CEOs of early stage products got rich overnight by announcing tokens, making some promises for NFT-based games, or creating "web3" platforms that only double users.

all

Web3 is not yet real. However, investing in an incredibly wealthy business can be devastating, and it is unfair to ignore these investments.

I think the global social issues and web2 issues are beneficial and deserve to be addressed. The engagement of web3 has a lot of interesting things to think about.

I believe that open, transparent, authority-less fundamental trust is good for the world and can balance and distribute energy.

We hope that the financial success of the cryptocurrency market will attract smart people and establish a fair and cooperative future without having to sell it to the public.

But I wouldn't be surprised if cryptocurrency developers have so much money that they ignore the technology and the desire of late investors to create a new network that allows them to buy Cardano NFT microtransactions to support their brush. electric toothed.

P.s.

I know I was caught in the crossfire and no arguments. They are all tech billionaires who got rich in the age of Facebook. Honestly, the outcome of the interview is not a problem. Because they are no longer future adventurers or developers. They may be financial, but their rogue right-wing model already thinks they will make more mistakes than they are.