The United States plans to introduce a cryptocurrency bill in 2022.

Senator Cynthia Lummis, official tokenqb.app in imtoken, Wyoming, is a U.S. lawmaker who is sponsoring several crypto defense plans and plans to introduce a digital asset bill next year. .

Bloomberg said in a statement on Thursday that the law, set out by Lummis, aims to provide clearer regulation for fixed coins, allowing regulators to cut them, determine whether cryptocurrencies belong to different asset classes and '' ensure consumer protection. According to the report, the US senator also called for the creation of an agency under the jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to oversee the cryptocurrency market.

On Twitter, Loomis urged U.S. voters to call on all representatives to support the bill, saying he is looking for supporters from both parties. WYOMING SENATOR - He's a brave guard, but without speaking against the former president, he voted against the commission of inquiry into the Jan. 6 bombing on the U.S. Capitol. . A number of intermediaries in the infrastructure law were enacted in November.

A bill proposed by the Senate would require the support of at least 60 representatives before being elected. Democrats now hold 50 of the 100 Senate seats, with Vice President Kamala Harris as a much-needed tiebreaker.

Prior to his Senate election, Lummis was a Bitcoin attorney and announced that he purchased between US $ 50,001 and US $ 100,000 worth of Bitcoin (BTC) under the Congressional Knowledge Stop Trading Act. Other lawmakers have said they have invested in cryptocurrency, including Senator Mary Newman from Illinois, Congressman Michael McCall from Texas, Congressman Pattumi from Pennsylvania, Congressman Barrymore from Alabama and Congressman from New Jersey. . Congressman Jefferson Van der Rohe and Florida Congressman Michael Waltz.

Across the mountain, successful MP ​​Alexander Ocasio-Cortez recently said on social media that he was not fit to hold BTC or any other digital asset. House Democrats argued that these investments could undermine justice because lawmakers have access to "important information and future policies."