Some "legends" on sushi

SUSHI is a very common problem these days. You don't need to dig deep into the default encrypted group to assume something is wrong. Carefully review the SUSHI billing statement and save it.

Sushi's native token, SUSHI, is one of the worst tokens of 2021. Given that this year is a bull market, SUSHI's price difference is shocking compared to regular cryptocurrency tokens. You can earn enough money by exchanging tokens on xSUSHI. Still, there are better options than Sushi's 17% APY.

It was recently reported that the problems with sushi far outweigh the realities of exchange rates. I always thought sushi was underrated, but I was wrong. The facts have shown that the basis for this agreement is also questionable.

I really like sushi.

Just over a year ago, sushi was still very popular. As a branch of Uniswap, Sushi developed a concept called "vampire attack" and became a center of attention. In short, this deal could generate $ 1 billion in Uniswap revenue in less than a week with better returns and more incentives.

Many cryptocurrency traders are familiar with Sushi from SushiSwap, but there are many more products in this offering. Kashi is a loan agency. BentoBox is a sign of interest back, when Sushi launched his NFT business called Shoyu last month.

Personally, I like DEX. SushiSwap is a chain agnostic. This technique is applied to other channels, even on channels not like Celo. However, this can be one of Sushi's weak points. The team got very thin because they created so many products all over the place.

From a crypto-philosophy perspective, Sushi is also seen as a good connection to the community and culture. It is without VC, DAO, and the key setting for a decentralized organization should be similar in all encryption zones.

Departure of the sushi maker

Before leaving, an anonymous person named 0xMaki brought some sushi. In September, it was announced that he would be leaving the project. Before the law was announced, the community was first aware of this as the 0xMaki wallet had been removed from Sushi's multi-signature project.

Back then, a lot of people, including myself, didn't think much about it. This can be an example of the decision maker making a retirement decision. After all, it is "done". He left a very beautiful story. In addition, he is also a consultant.

But since last month we started to hear rumors.

Gossip - What's going on behind the scenes?

Two weeks ago, a sudden message appeared on my tweet. Meanwhile, the price volatility of sushi has increased. The store looks tired, but still close to the best cattle store. This week (3 - 4 December 2021) has not yet taken place.

The report alleges that the blogger on the management was not the main Sushi group, which in terms of dishonesty. According to this theory, people often complain about the lack of culture and clarity. No one really knows how sushi works. Since this is a policy, communities believe they are not participating.

In the crypto development cycle everyone knows each other and often times when something catastrophic happens you will see a team like the one in the tweet. It may sound like a false accusation, but it has opened the human eye to some extent.

This is the first tweet accusing Sushi of being a major mismanagement group. At first, the main group didn't seem to be making the real accusation, so they didn't respond directly.

When people think it's just gossip, a lot of people decide to say it. One of them is the creator of Sushi's BentoBox, known on Twitter as BoringCrypto.

Make this statement too true. This caused a stir in the community and demanded an explanation. This is a major issue that the main team cannot ignore.

Sushi's current CTO, Joseph Delong, is expected to respond. He also tweeted that what had happened was the rage of anger that mournfully threatened him to leave.

Sushi Company

First of all, sushi should be DAO, but why a CTO is little known. But once you find out what happened to Uniswap, you'll understand why.

The current management of Sushi believes that it is impossible to work Sushi as a DAO and expect policyholders to vote on any decision. This is something that a lot of people disagree with.

Communities often disagree with CTO responses. In addition to the tweets, his comments became too personal and inactive. This is not good for DeFi leaders. A lot of people have expressed concern about it, but there are also manufacturers who support it.

To be honest, he has every right to be offended, especially if the rumors are false. But his response did not help the situation.

weird ideas

A few hours ago a comment came immediately to the sushi meeting.

This typo shows that the anger of “communities faced with criticizing their work” has become recognition when it comes to emotion. But that only makes the situation worse.

When I thought it was the most outrageous, the CTO announced it a few hours later.

At that time, many already believed that Sushi was ngmi.

If you are a sushi chip holder, it depends on what you think of this story.

But there are clear signs that the Sushi team now has too much internal friction. Words cannot explain clearly, but my thoughts tell me that something is wrong, which makes me question my faith in this project as an entrepreneur. I'm not sure about the CTO either.

This is an unfortunate testimony, especially since sushi is such a great activity. Although the community is calling for reconstruction, it is unlikely that there will be any major renovations at this time. Time will tell if Sushi can do as many community approvals as it once did.