$ 130 trillion bet: the meta-universe has a data-driven revolution

Start with macro trends. A few days ago, when a reader posted a personal message from a group, I wrote an article asking why, speaking of macro-politics and economics, it was only compared to the United States for domestic affairs, and rarely like Europe, Japan. , or other countries. race.

This is a good question, but asking this question also shows that it is not clear on the history but on the last ten years. This problem can be highlighted by looking at the GDP growth of many countries. In 2010, world GDP is estimated at $ 66 trillion, by 2020 world GDP is around $ 84 trillion, and 10 years later, world GDP will reach $ 18 trillion. But if you look closely, you can see that China's GDP has grown by $ 8.8 trillion over the past ten years, while that of the United States has grown by $ 6 trillion. 14.8 trillion dollars, or more than 80% of global GDP growth over the same period! To be honest, Yu Zilulu doesn't deserve much attention. In fact, for many countries around the world, you can see that this decade has been a decade of economic turmoil.

You can also find more interesting if you go deeper on the layer. In addition to SININE-USA, GDP also has a national growth with ASEAN, India, Korea, Nigeria, United States, USA. The countries grow most of the "Chinese economic vircles is to provide resources for production and nutritious or accrue of business in China. China cycle. The more facts are 2010 GDP Mexico received money, and Canada 10 years later, Mexico is $. In the correct place of Japan that is "disappeared for 30 years". In fact, many countries with good people at least 10 years. United States of Education, but other countries capacity, lots of financial results. I learned two of the above, and understand why blue decoration of the silver .

Therefore, there is no way for economic growth if we do not move closer to the Chinese economy in the late stages of the 3rd Industrial Revolution. This is a general and general overview of the current international business model. The United States and the West want to change this. Otherwise, China will eventually get the hegemonic industry. However, at the time of the 3rd industrial revolution, nothing can change this notion, and the only hope is called the 4th information revolution, a change in the new profession of industry.

One of the most significant recent developments in the Western Hemisphere is the security crisis in Glasgow, UK. The first week went well and hundreds of western workers went their separate ways. Many investors (GFANZ joint venture of more than 450 companies in the world) have pledged 130 trillion dollars in exchange for energy! Maths of astronomical vertigo! This is the equivalent of the total GDP of the United States, which has not eaten or drunk for six years! Frankly, if such a large investment were made in aerospace, one would assume that humans lived on Mars a long time ago. But obviously, investors are less interested in the big plane than in the “green energy” and “green data” markets. The stars, the oceans and the macrocosm have been difficult to achieve for many years, more specifically, the industry that goes beyond "advertising technology" is not accepted because it is difficult to make money by because of the high cost associated with it.

Green energy and data are two completely different things. A step is not only rewarding, but it can also achieve deeper goals. The 'carbon limits' can detect changes in the lower part of the product design, and four data changes will be transmitted to the tertiary sector. revolution.

The importance of carbon restrictions can be compared to historical “slave restrictions”. In the early stages of the rise of the West, it was characterized by the plundering of slaves and the forcing of the lower echelons of agricultural production to profit from it, linked to the great price difference between the product and the product. Rewards. But why the ban on slavery? Is it because the desire of Western capital has discovered it? Anyone who believes he's a liar. The main reason is that the functioning of the economy rather than slavery and forced labor forces traders to change jobs from unprofitable agriculture to good product development. Selfishness and utilitarianism support the limits of slavery.

So carbon offsets are the green capital of the next generation, and the previous generation capital investment revolution seeks to create some great "new discoveries." Under this agreement, the relationship between industry and first generation manufacturing is eliminated and rejected, and industry-age-manufacturing relationships are gradually established. In the era of slavery and commercial capital, people give up physical strength, in the era of industrial capital, people give up the ability to process, and in the era of green capital, people provide information (the right to operate is a system intellectual right). For example, platforms like Meta (formerly Facebook) are trying to create their own "new super data factory" that aims to turn thousands of people into "data agents" and user goods. The end of the new generation of energetic and social development is, of course, "metacosmic", the virtual world of stars twinkling within stars.

Such growth in the meta-cosmic direction is certainly having a positive impact. Although in most of the countries focused on manufacturing and construction, Yang Ma developed equipment to support the reduction of carbon emissions on November 8, providing financial companies with low costs and encouraging investments in the green environment and low carbon emission. It cannot be easily understood as environmental protection and solar wind power, improving industrial data is the key to green and low carbon.

However, the orientation of the meta world is not without its drawbacks. I think the universe is the “evolution” of human life and the “evolution” of human life. In contrast, "indulge in spiritual opium, you will never forget the stars and the oceans" and "Zuckerberg's metacosm is not the future, but it is not the future The meta-world will have thousands of people in the future in the form of virtual humans, lying flat on the big servers in their basement and having a good life. It's human suicide.

In a sense, the meta-world is “about” human development, and the stars and oceans are “the use” and development of humanity. In these two models, the capitalists clearly prefer the meta edge. As for the starfish, Musk SpaceX is essentially the only seed in the West, researching aerospace advantages in "space travel" and technological advantages, while in the countryside the West is sort of " touristic destination ". Whether it's NASA or the European Space Agency. It appears to be a stable organization. Other countries, such as Japan and India, are still in the early stages of “picking up their country”. China, created by socialist nature, is the only country that really decided to take the path of stars, sea and space. The end of faith is in achieving human "body satisfaction" because the earth's resources are limited, so only the infinite capacity of stars and oceans can experience this belief.

The strength of blockchain and cryptocurrency lies in the technological development of new industries in the meta-world. Of course, the global meta is also a “50-year growth pattern” that starts in 10 years, expands in 30 years, and grows in 50 years. In 10 years or less, the global meta is only worth the hype when it comes to investing. Every corporate meta-universe is a "virtual universe" and there will be no real leaders. Long-term investments can start after 10 years.