ETH L2 Rollup Decentralized development management forecast

Cumulation is a key part of ETH's expansion.

Now, running totals are centralized. That is, there is a full transaction that identifies L2 and the middle ball and sends the trade to L1. I think it will be decentralized in the future. This means that multiple nodes will allocate nodes for execution using the consensus scheme.

The decentralization of the L2 rollup is expected to be completed in two stages.

Currently, each part of a project in Rollup is a basic single node system.

The first step is for all stakeholders to open the node and go through a special approval process to complete the validation and completion process.

The second step is for the Ethereum Foundation to improve the accumulation of "functionalities" and the integration of the protocol in the ETH2.0 mining node (PoS). In other words, the consensus to "unite" is the same as the consensus. ETH 2.0 procedures.

The current operating mechanism of the L2-Rollup is as follows:

1. Each L2-Rollup in L1 has a smart contract wallet, users deposit L1 coins into this wallet, and their assets are mapped to users in L2 -Rollup.

2. Users can submit changes using L2-Rollup. To users, it appears to be providing a lot of traffic from L1, unless the wallet-type metamask needs to configure RPC on the L2-Rollup project. This is equivalent to sending another EVM-compatible channel using the metamask.

3. The principle of proof and L2-Rollup acceptance sent by the user can be explained in one sentence. It works on L1.

What I did the OP (optimist) group said I had bet the coin on L1 but if anyone can prove that I am not they can bet me to prove that I am not and keep my piece.

OP Pi downloads the transfer files sent by the user from L2 to L1 in the dialog, this is called rollup, rollup and throw. However, although the L1 nodes do not recognize these changes, they believe that the OP cumulation is not a hoax. However, if anyone is surprised, you can start the race as long as you are running all the swap files on L1. You can see the results.

According to ZK School, Lao-tse uses mathematical data to prove what I did. Check it out and you'll know I am. Math will not deceive.

ZK-rollup also downloads the conversion files from L2 to L1 in the dialog and also sends the credentials. Any recipient of data and data supported by calldata can verify that these changes only run on zk-L2 according to the L1 rule.

Now let's talk about the centralization of rollups.

The third step of the above process is to perform the rollup operation (1. Confirm the user's transaction, 2. Roll the transactions sent by the user through L2 and provide the launch to L1) that she either terminated on one or more nodes, decentralized from the problem.

The Running Rollup is the node on which the Rollup development project is running. It looks like only one of the strings. It is centralized.

Rollup nodes design ensure customer value even if it is the core, rollup nodes can not steal assets from customers, have the idea to ensure customers can come back from L1 even if the cumulative nodes stop working. .

However, centralized rollups do not stand up to censorship. 1. You can set up a free application to block certain addresses or certain work areas. 2. Strong organizations (like the government) can block it.

To achieve censorship protection, just as chains can avoid multiple nodes, it is best to decentralize it so that nodes perform free rollup operations to join and implement recommendations specifically to discuss nodes to complete the job. rollup. Much like the blockchain industry for mining.

For example, zk sync plans to run 30-100 nodes, nodes open and who can distribute them, and coin holders (zksync own coins) will vote to determine which nodes are selected. Same as EOS Supernode.

L2-Rollup developer can also use PoW for competitive validation nodes.

I hope that in the future the larger companies to implement this distribution, create their own parts, and then use the PoS protocol to control the nodes will be used yes.

If the planner removes their own coin on each issue and uses PoS to implement the option, Ethereum L1 has two levels of approval. ; The other is PoS (or PoW), which many L2 rollup projects do on their own, monitoring L2 transactions and uploading data exchanges (zk and media files) to L1.

L2-Rollup also informs users that they don't have to pay ETH because the miner fee sends the L2 swap, but the checker pays on behalf of the L1 miners. Money paid or exchanged for free in L2 as a miner's fee is self-employed L2.

And the user experience of L can be improved as L1.

This upgrade user will be able to send multiple changes to L2, C end users will be captured by L2-Rollup, and ETHL1 will be the A-B chain providing L2-Rollup.

I don't think there is a future for L1 blockchain joining market B. 1.to B is not as valuable as C (for C ETH the value will be higher). Conversely, this would limit the decentralization of L1. As in 2017, when the price of BTC miners was high, many exchanges and wallet sellers knew where the exchange blocks would be packed and traded with the mining pool to pay the price of the miners to buy blocks of space. It is a major disaster for decentralization. 3. It is recommended to let Alibaba and Google trade on To-B chain, compared to ETH, I think key chain like BSC is suitable for To-B industry.

Therefore, I predict that in the future the ETH Foundation will recognize (or support) the “work” project that will be put in place for:

The “official L2-Rollup” verification node is integrated into the ETH-L1 block generation node. For example, in PoW, the mining pool node is a stacking node, and in PoS, the super node is a stacking node. . L1 nodes (either the mining pool or ETH2.0 super-nodes) can form blocks and each can perform a stack.

And "L2-Rollup" users must submit transactions using ETH as the miner value.

With this design, the L2-Rollup is the same as the ETH-L1 in terms of security of ownership and decentralization. And L2-Rollup can also improve the privacy that L1 lacks.