Metacosm: "Singing" with an opaque veil

David Chalmers is a thought leader in memory. His academic career began in mathematics, but gradually developed into cognition and perception of the mind. He eventually entered Indiana University under the supervision of Douglas Hofstadter and won the Pulitzer Prize for his book "Gödel, Escher, Bach: Eternal Golden Braid".

— David Chalmers

In 2007, around 1 million people were immersed in 'Second Life' with the desire to become a network-based 3D alternative reality version before 2003.

In "Second Life", players can modify and draw their own in-game avatar, walk around an avatar, and enjoy a variety of activities.

Players will listen to Kurt Vonnegut have fun, dance at dreamy nightclubs like Hot Lick and Angry Ant, shop for clothes and virtual goods at Armani stores, visit famous sites like Rockefeller Center and virtual digital real estate. .

Is the above situation similar to the "meta universe" inaccuracy described now? The difference, however, is that "Second Life" is a virtual world and the meta-world is a mixture of "real world" and "virtual world".

"Second Life", if you would give me my second life in VR, would you still be willing to live in the real world?

So part of the puzzle when Zuckerberg talks about the meta-world is that he wants to rethink "virtual reality" with gaming or the integration of the Facebook Oculus VR headset to enter the meta-universe. .

“The global meta is an industry-wide vision, and it exists in many companies,” Zuckerberg told The Verge in July of this year.

Briefly understand Zuckerberg's message: The meta-world is a whole world of interconnected and shared virtual spaces. Importantly, personal avatars can be transmitted in these virtual environments.

intellectual intelligence

We are going to create a new world and new animals with more energy than us.

An avatar in the meta-world is simply a new person of human intelligence, i.e. general intelligence, born into the new world of the meta-universe.

What is general knowledge of art? General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) is a system capable of opening independent functions of specific questions or human concepts, such as conversation, curiosity, and reasoning.

People like the intelligence of the "western world" can talk and ...

The philosopher David Chalmers believes that intellectual intelligence is often possible. Some predict that generalization will happen in 10 or 20 years. David Chalmers says, “I would be surprised if the results prove these people are right. Many major revivals in deep education have recently focused on finding patterns in raw data.

From David Chalmers point of view, deep study is very good for us as human beings, like knowledge of pictures and knowledge of speech. But wherever there is freedom, thought, decision-making, creativity, etc., intellectual skills are only required to work in certain fields.

General AI is pretty good in games like Go. But once you get into the real world things get tough. “You have to climb a lot of mountains to achieve AGI on a human level. In 40 to 100 years, for example, I think it's finally possible,” said David Chalmers.

The robot itself learns chess and holds the grandmaster.

There is no doubt that when people have human intelligence, they will change the world. How can I explain? From David Chalmers' point of view: AGIs will start out as strong animals like us, and soon they will become more powerful animals than us.

David Chalmers enjoys studying human memory and distinguishing between cognitive and cognitive. For him, skills have to do with the capabilities of machines, that is, what they can do and the benefits with which they can create entry-level products.

When it comes to intelligence, the key question is, given some issues and goals, can you think of a way to accomplish them? If possible, it is a sign of intelligence. Memory is a problem of the past.

You and I have skills, but we also have education, so if you have experience, it feels like you live in it. This thought, or memory, gives meaning to our life. David Chalmers explained that this is also what makes us corporate.

shield

Although awareness is the result of recreating legal documents with clear standards, there will be a shield that differs in behavior that appears to be inspired by past experiences of learning behaviors.

I have a question here. If we have fair accountability for key products only when those products are clear, how can we manage our unfair liability to AI?

What is hidden under an opaque veil?

Regarding the above question, in theory this is an old question from another point of view. How do you know if another person or body has a spirit? I know I have a brain.

Descartes said: "I think. It's something I'm sure of. So I'm convinced." But when it comes to other people and computers, he says he's not sure.

What should the model be? Can you make sure that a knowledge system can only do something difficult? You never win a game on Go. The ability to have an intelligent conversation will be the starting point.

In the meta-world, maybe cognitive intelligence could explain my state of consciousness as follows:

Perhaps most important in David Chalmers' theory is not to confuse the state of mind. "I know objectively that this is just a collection of silicon circuits, but in my opinion it is a lot."

Some people might argue that people can decide to remember and that decision can increase the memory potential of another wise person if there are too many different differences between them.

Roblox's Metaverse Vision

What David Chalmers likes is the way of being in the virtual world, it is to think of gradually transforming into "IA, you are an IA".download gradually.

Replace the neurons with the next computer, one at a time, or transfer them to your computer. Start by completing the biological system, quarterly biological, quarterly silicon, then biological, half-silicon, quarterly biological, quarterly silicon, and finally all silicon.

If you complete her attempt throughout the process, you'll be there until the end and always say, “Yes, I'm still home! If it's proof, it's only proof. Others even say "I think you are a zombie".

Kantism

It is conceivable that the meta-world is not only intellectually intelligent, but also integrated in a non-destructive way.

In a future where virtual reality will improve everyone, collaboration will be no exception as we all have the energy to count, memorize and mix best practices and advertising?

Play games, play concerts, attend business meetings, and more. In an unlimited 3D digital world with easy access like the Internet, there are a few things we can do about it. There is no other break than working together to solve the most common problems affecting human health.

"Infinite 3D Digital World" is the only museum that enters the virtual world to showcase cryptographic art.

I hope we can find a better solution to climate change. Palestine-Israel problem solved in 30 seconds? It might be a bit difficult. According to David Chalmers, “A lot of our conflicts come together. Some of our conflicts have to do with our mission, I want my mission to be to think and you want what you want.

One solution is for each of us to achieve the second desired outcome, or the third most desired. However, people are not very good at solving these problems.

A whole new model would be needed to influence and find goals that we can develop. But it is not the end of the only tools of intelligence on the means, but to think of more, like identifying what are our objectives.

Emanuel Kant believes that morality is part of reason. The idea is that superintelligent AIs will become superethical AIs and Kantian beings, using only universal goals for everyone. This is a very good idea of ​​how the "body" of general knowledge can be developed in the metaverse.

Gallery Kijaidesign 3DP, created by Jukka Seppanen-POKE by AltspaceVR

And here is another question. In the midst of Kant's life and in the process of creating our own path to our own death, what should we do with our vision of the future?

I believe everyone loves human history so much and is selfish and hope this will continue in the future. Then, as the body is made up of cells, we impact nature and the world. So, "How important is it for the future of mankind to be poisoned?" "

Sometimes we have to face the fact that smart boards will work faster than our boards. If we are to keep up with our brains, people risk falling behind in the world of super-fast, super-smart computers. Finally, the issues that people face are:People have to adapt.

Another possibility is that we are entering a metaspatial world and new AI characters are invading the world and there is no more room for people. Humans can be abandoned to a virtual world or part of the physical world, becoming second nature.

At the very least, they'll treat humans like animals or live together for fun or history. If this happens, you will be embarrassed. People can live in the virtual world, but people won't know and forget about it all.

The Resurrection of the Matrix report showcases the mix of virtual and real world, the new creations of Neo and Trinity.

As in the scene from "The Matrix": humans are available to maintain robots. Our brief is all about engagement, and they work by the rules. Our biological bodies are simply placed in "cans" which have positive content. . . . This may be the case, as some scientists have described it as "humans now living in a virtual world".

"Virtual" and "Daemon problem"

The word "virtual" originally meant "false" or "like".

Now may be the time to define virtual reality. After all, there are many ways to use the word "virtual". The meta world is proud of its authenticity and the visibility of the word “virtual”.

A virtual chain looks like a tie. However, after years of development, the term "virtual" has evolved. Now it means "computer generated".

Facebook computer creates virtual meta-universe store

I have a question here. In what sense is this real and can it be true in these contexts? It is also a measure of the difference between "metacosmic dreams" and "real dreams". Simply put, how do we get this “virtual environment”?

This is a serious idea. Excellent Irish experts for: "There is a recognized one." If you look like an OS, it's duck if you hear it looks like the OS. This is the Lord. The world in your heart.

But the main point of view is that the truth is outside the mind. To be a real person, you need not only your face, but your talents or abilities as well.

Australian philosopher Samuel Alexander gave the term "real person". "To be a real person, there has to be a relationship." But if you can make a real difference, there is success.

Even Philip K. Dick once said, “If you no longer believe, you will never go. But in general, reality has a long way to go.

According to Zuckerberg, the ultimate definition of metacosm, objects in the virtual reality of metacosm, at least in principle, have all of these properties.

A virtual tree that exists in the virtual world, DreamVR

Let's say you live in a virtual world with visual objects. Even if I wasn't there, the virtual tree would fall.

Virtual trees are interdependent. Falling virtual trees can make people more aware. Drops in the virtual world can crash and become conscious. Virtual reality is another kind of reality, but it is also real.

It's like Descartes' "Devil Trouble" when someone here asks, "Isn't reality just a vision of materialism?"

As René Descartes says, "How do you know if you are not cheated and think they are real and no one is?" The question of virtual reality is a bit like that of Descartes with the devil.

An example for the modern version: "How do you know you are not in the matrix?" How do you know you are not in computer simulation? It all looks real, but how do you know if none of it is real? "

Even movies like "The Matrix" can make people think "this is bad". "It's not true. No, it's just a lie."

The idea that virtual reality is not real comes from the previous view of reality. In the Garden of Eden, it is believed that the first red wine was returned to its original place, and everything looks like it.

Eager to enter the world with the actors in their quest for Pandora X?

We know from modern science that it is not for the world. A color is just a collection of wavelengths created by the physical movement of an object, and those wavelengths create meaning for us. Security? There is nothing in the world that you can really trust.

The product is usually empty space, but there is a strong build in us that makes it feel good. That space and time slowly melt away, or at least reduce to a simple physics.

Physical reality is now like virtual reality. David Chalmers thinks he has the ability to behave, "In physical reality everything is worse. It's not true," but we all hold that and say, "Well, without" Yes, we think it is. 'they are, and they are ".

It should also be a good attitude towards virtual reality. The code and silicon circuits are just another card really. Does computer science create a reality worse than modern physics says? Is the quantum wave operating at an uncertain value? It looks subtle and fantastic, much like virtual reality.

relation "set of hats"

Some people ask, "Is it helpful to say that metacosmic virtual reality is not another reality, but the reality of the reality it usually lives on?" "

The metacosmic virtual space joins Zeus and Hera on Mount Olympus

It's a bit like the multiverse. That's not to say there isn't a real goal. There can be a universe of purpose that has it all in place. There can be first level worlds where humans do simulations and virtual reality, sometimes there are simulations in the simulations, and no one knows how many layers. This would also be what Zuckerberg wanted to accomplish: "Creating first-level metavers, and the other metavers are just subsets of it." "

David Chalmers has already predicted: “We are ranked 42nd in the world. One thing to keep in mind is that in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Milky Way" they provide a computer for life, the world, everything. .

Years later, the computer said, "The answer is 42." What would be the last and most important question to which the answer can only be numbers? Well. The question can sometimes be: "At what level are we?

At the same time, can you imagine this virtual world tracking down unique historical processes, political upheavals, cultural upheavals, etc. Intuitively, he thought so.

It already has a virtual world that recreates the history of culture. In the early 1990s, the multi-user domain (MUD) was the first to be regulated or hijacked. There was a man to do, and he was a dictator. Then he raised a few wizards - nobles.

Performance of virtual characters HP, VR

But wizards didn't need all of this power, so they gave it all away. Most of the virtual worlds that exist today are owned and operated by businesses. An example is "Second Life" from Linden Lab.

However, this has its own issues. The members of the real body have been released. No president can change or alter the rules as needed. Therefore, public concerns include: Is the lack of freedom of membership a serious threat to the virtual world?

There will be a lot of virtual space, and I'm not sure what to think, "If you go for the virtual world, it will definitely be managed by the company that owns it."

We can change the frequency of multiple virtual worlds. You will work in a virtual world, another world of pleasure, another world of learning. No one will run cyberspace. That's Zuckerberg's vision for an entire virtual metaverse world.

virtualisation

Ultimately, we all want to know if we can move from the physical reality to the metacosmic reality of the human being.

In the past, we've talked about intellectual property, a person's life digitally uploaded to virtual reality, and a brief line of physical and virtual reality. So, will this fire in this house go out forever?

Metaverse also allows you to browse chat sites using your phone.

Assuming the physical reality was a zero level reality, there would always be. We always need more help. "Let the sun blow on a powerful computer. But not enough! We also have to cross the galaxy on foot to another location." You can imagine what it would look like. Weapon-dependent competition.

It is easy to imagine that 99% of the population will live in the virtual world. Especially if Earth's bodies change dramatically after a nuclear disaster or dangerous climate change.

At that time, the virtual world will be very interesting and exciting, some people will want to live in a zero world, some people will want to live in the city, and some people will want to live in the countryside.

Today, the community is more and more in the city, but that doesn't mean that everyone lives in the same city. At the same time, there can be multiple virtualized communities, but that doesn't mean that everyone will be virtualized.

Microsoft's masterpiece, a Metauniverse Mall store, with a fidelity that is infinitely close to reality

The virtual world is not a panacea for solving human problems. It can be like the Internet. Wonderful things can happen, or terrible things can happen.

But it will make room for all areas of the human body, and in this sense it would be at least as real for the physical body. You can find unique ways to improve virtual reality and gain more freedom and justice, but you won't.

But at least it's an open and happy future!