Beware of the centralized meta-world launched by Facebook.

The meta edge craze started when Facebook changed its name to "Meta", and domestic and foreign organizations went wild with hotspots, and the tokens of the meta edge concept in encryption skyrocketed .

After this excitement, we have to think about the technology in the middle meta-world. Can this lead us to the long-awaited meta-universe?

Facebook hasn't disclosed details of the meta world, but one thing is for sure. Facebook will reverse Diem's ​​currency-centric activity and announce NFTs on the Diem network.

What is DM? Diem, formerly known as Libra, is a profitable business operating through a network of licensed intermediary companies.

Naturally, all the assets of the Diem network are monitored by an organization and connected to a real identity. This means that the strengths of the meta world are also important.

For example, Facebook can freeze an asset and make a change in 1 second, which is no different than the real world today.

This "wall" approach is designed for large companies. There is no doubt that there will be an influx of many current users in the short term, and the data is actually better than a decentralized project.

However, as noted by Nick Rose Ntertsas, CEO and founder of NFT's Ethernity channel, in fact, users are already tired of Facebook.

“During the digital transformation driven by the pandemic in the world, the adoption of cryptocurrencies has quintupled. At the same time, global advocacy shows that people are unreliable technological bases and more and more technologies unreliable as a result of increased observations in terms of protection, achievement of peers - peer-to-peer transactions and support for transparency and immutability. "

What are the advantages of a distributed meta-universe project? It can run on an open and unauthorized blockchain architecture.

Each developer can create anonymity functions of the public blockchain, and each user can secure their own virtual property and join the virtual asset.

One of the great advantages of distributed and open source design is that users can join and browse multiple meta-worlds without hassle. Assets, including cryptocurrencies, securities, NFTs, or anything else, can be transferred throughout the chain. The members are in you. hands is your real tool.

However, given the size of Facebook's user base, this can have a huge impact on initial distribution. After all, the intermediary organization has users and an account creator.

Maybe decentralized platforms are doomed to the same fate as Instagram and WhatsApp and can be swallowed up in meta-purchases?

Sébastien Borget, co-founder and COO of Sandbox, said: “Most high-tech companies will stand idly by and new entrants will struggle to enter the market.

So a lot of financial support is needed, which is why web 3.0 is so strong.Through the collaboration of the platform and the user to create an independent platform, the user becomes the owner of the control and ultimately reaches."

Just as Libra created a sensation around the world but is ultimately persecuted by the authorities, Facebook enjoys the benefits of a grassroots grassroots and has been favored by the centralized response.

For the most part, Libra has provided great division coverage, but going forward, centralization vs. Decentralization will inevitably struggle.

So, for global business campaigns, mid-sized companies are still subject to the rules, but it is important that they provide better technology and services than mid-sized companies.