Web3.0's super Dapp zoo?

On November 28, the SocialFi Monaco Planet Beta project was released and presented to the crypto community. As a platform reserved for Yacht NFT users and users with login invitations, the floor price of OpenSea Yacht NFT has been reduced from 0.09 ETH to around 0.5 ETH, and the invitation policy has changed. also been increased.

Monaco's design is simple. Its main characteristics are portfolio access and content exploration.Users can earn MONA, the platform's unique characters, by following, liking and commenting, featuring NFTs and issues. But I don't like special. Indeed, from the point of view of the logic of the product, it is the idea of ​​the user, not the idea of ​​the manufacturer. Fostering a “follow, like, advise” attitude can help developers, but when content becomes income, bad money can make a lot of money. The loss of Bihu, a project once popular with the Chinese, proves that manufacturers want more money. A developer friendly environment is probably the reason they want to stay for a long time.

The web3.0 social platform will be developer-centric.

In fact, the limited resources of any social platform, be it web2.0 or web3.0, are the content developers and the users.We know that "relationships" are the engine of growth for big names like Facebook and Twitter, but to date advancements in relationships have led almost everyone to go online. Would Facebook and Twitter have an advantage if the platform was still designed by consumers? As long as these platforms release coins and encourage users to link their crypto wallets to profit from content creation, likes, comments, etc., there is room for platforms similar to Monaco. I think the reason why the encrypted relation has not been released for a long time is because the relation of web3.0 is not in the opinion of the users, but of the tsim. The platforms are no longer closed, but open and interconnected.

What do manufacturers want?

The first is one click release. It is linked to a unique user ID and distributed to all subscribers regardless of the platform they are on. The second is to modify the configuration file. Universal Digital IDs No need to manually create your own library, as it can be automatically populated and edited by entering your ID.

This is because author-created content is stored for public view rather than on a particular platform's server. Mirrors, for example, store the content of a repository called Arweave. When the mirror closes tomorrow, I can ask Arweave to have all the signatures signed with my address in the wallet. Here are some things web2.0 cannot do, but web3.0 can do.

And build business relationships with the content they create, other designers, and fans. It's not about finances or advertising content.

Moreover, for web3.0 users, you have to follow your favorite design everywhere. That is, one click view. Just search for his unique ID number on the social platform and you can get author updates anywhere. Because for the fans, you are following that person, not on a special platform. This is also not possible in web2.0, but possible in web3.0.

The masses of web2.0 have shifted to the quality of open and interoperable design-centric products. For example, Substacks and Patreons grow their business by optimizing the developer experience rather than engaging with customers. This can be considered as web2.5 because developer users can receive email updates and download content anytime, but uninterrupted on the Substack and Patreons platforms. So it's just a change. The reason Facebook is doing this, including changing its name to Meta Universe, is simple. This is because developers are an extremely competent entity in another iteration once the network has entered a phase. In a needs relationship, you are the supplier, not the consumer. Only by providing the right services and amenities can they get more bottled water.

A Web2.0 product can be compared to a Web3.0 product by the following four concepts:

Author ID:All platforms for web2.0 products require a registered ID, and for web3.0 products, the author only needs to maintain a unique ID.

Save content:Web2.0 is stored on the apex server and web3.0 is stored on open source code and linked to Creator ID.

Social and economic relations:Web2.0 products can be created and managed by your own application, and Web3.0 products can be created with public approval.

Contents:Each web2.0 product has its own model, and web3.0 products can serve as an open model for ecosystem integration.

So, in the final analysis, interconnection is a key issue for web3.0 device compatibility. Because without it NFTs, social tokens, crypto wallets, DEXs, etc. could not be assembled like Lego constructions. Maybe the next wave of things will be driven by this. For example, Ethereum registers ENS, brightID digital ID, etc.

Can you see Super Dapp?

However, with the emergence of more and more vertical crypto products, questions remain as to whether users can access the difficult app maze. Is it possible for super DAPPs to emerge as leaders and join them? Like WeChat, it permeates every moment of a user's daily life, anytime, anywhere, from morning to night.

In fact, it can be done in web3.0. It is easier to create super dapps than WeChat due to the interaction between the dapps. For example, if you want financial tools, you have to build WeChat yourself and you can choose a great dapp from the existing apps like Aave or Uniswap. Discussion tools, XMTP and Convo are available. Plus, Super DApps aren't monopolized like WeChat, so they can edit faster and horizontally with less care.

This is because the cost of the web3 Internet is concentrated in the protocol layer instead of the application layer, creating a “heavy protocol, thin application” configuration problem.

The development of the process layer in recent years and the human importance of layer 1 and layer 2 have proven this.

The Super Dapps app layer has no bottom line, only its own users or members. Super Dapps can provide users with most of the features used in their daily life, such as WeChat, so the “apps” competition is a win-win. Eventually, one or more super DApps will become giants like WeChat.