Talk about Polygon, the "Internet" of Ethereum compatible channels

Polygon chains are the origin of the single-layer networks that began as Matic. Once released, Matic will be "the Internet of Blockchains", allowing developers to create products with interconnected and interconnected chains. However, as Ethereum has become the centerpiece of smart contracts, the polygon is slowly disappearing from the human eye, but with the improvement of the entire network and the saturation of Ethereum, the market is slowly starting to understand the importance. of the chain cut. As a result, the Polygon team turned to the kernel that created and connected Ethereum-compatible blockchains to help develop Ethereum.

Polygon has always focused on users and developers. After the rebranding, the developers said, “The message to developers has become a reality. With Polygon's dual aura of optimizing the developer experience and making Ethereum easier to scale, Polygon could be a success.

Over the past six months, a number of contracts shipped to Polygon have gone through Ethereum.

Since May 2021, the number of modern shelters has increased significantly.

For Polygon to continue to grow, it must attract and retain new developers. To help developers (and end users) get involved in building an ecosystem, the Polygon team is focused on creating a lightweight, distributed growth environment for blockchain networks, while ensuring security. modules ("security services").

Disadvantages of Ethereum, polygon fracture

As Ethereum has emerged as a blockchain leader, it enjoys a thriving ecosystem and oil prices have become an incredible condition for many consumers. Polygon's decision to focus on the Ethereum ecosystem is now an example. . In the first half of 2021, oil prices were above 100 gwei, and at the same time, they once exceeded 350 gwei.

Due to Ethereum's exchange rates and the difficulty of network integration, the exchange can cost users tens or hundreds of dollars and increase transaction time.

Polygon aims to solve the problem of doubling exchange costs and time costs by providing a variety of solutions while retaining Ethereum users. Polygon has been very good with Ethereum in terms of goals and concepts, and more importantly with the EVM relationship, Polygon has secured Ethereum as well.

Polygon frame: consensus

Chains of freedom and chains of security

There are two types of blockchains that we can call Polygon: independent chains and secure chains.

A "freedom" chain is a blockchain that does not rely on Ethereum's commitment to security. This solution is intended for projects that already have their own validation nodes or want to use other scalability solutions. These independent chains are typically used by companies or large chains that want to integrate into the Polygon-Ethereum ecosystem.

A "security" chain is a chain that does not identify itself but relies on the Polygon security layer. Polygon offers high security while allowing manufacturers to choose from a variety of security solutions, the most popular being the Polygon Proof-of-Stake (PoS) chain. These safety chains are designed to accompany start-ups and operations which require good safety.

It is easy for manufacturers to perform, whether on a stand-alone or secure chain. This ease of deployment gives developers more choices to meet the needs of their customers, and that ease comes from Polygon's infrastructure.

architecture

Blockchains called Polygon, with independent or secure chains, run in the same framework. Polygon's architecture consists of four components: the Ethereum layer, the security layer, the Polygon network layer and the layer.

Ethereum layer

Polygon uses Ethereum as a base layer. These processes include Ethereum smart contracts, which are determined by identifying nodes, validating evidence, and exchanging data on the polygons and the Ethereum ecosystem. These layers are responsible for Ethereum's ultimate solution. This layer is optional, but this product of the architecture is the strength of the polygon. By using Ethereum as the ultimate, Polygon can be upgraded and benefit from the security of Ethereum as the ultimate shield.

security layer

The second architectural layer is an optional security layer. This layer is called “service-based evidence” because it allows manufacturers to identify companies that use a variety of solutions. Users can use evidence of fraud or PoS side chains (and other solutions) for security.

By far the most popular solution is the PoS sidechain. The PoS sidechain uses a group of around 100 applications to provide security for blockchain projects (special low cost) and to enable node management. These layers can also achieve authentication using Ethereum miners (ultimate validator nodes).

Again, this layer is optional. In general, the distant first-level process processes are generally not secure, but improve the business experience and the user experience. Not all channels require the Polygon security layer. Some projects, such as racing games, may want to reduce risk in exchange for faster testing so that players have a better experience for users.

polygon layer

The polygon layer is a network of independent blockchains and is responsible for each chain's marketing, blocking, and approval decisions. These chains can be independent chains or secure chains. As a security solution, the network protocol defines Merkle as the first layer of authentication.

leadership level

Finally, the process is complete. The complete definition of the process and the completion of the operations determined by the Polygon network layer. This set has two components.

A performance environment used by a virtual machine. Similar to EVM, the state of the blockchain can be tracked.

Execution logic - Recognizes the transition state of a single polygon blockchain. This concept is used to identify the transition to the next state of the blockchain, and Ethereum can be thought of as an "endless state machine". Unlike (finite state machines, finite state machines, abbreviations: FSM), finite state machines are often referred to as state machines, which are mathematical models representing a finite number of states, and their changes and modifications. State. job).

However, of all the layers, the most important added value for the manufacturer is the security layer. Because it allows you to get the most out of the Polygon framework transition. Designers can choose the climate solution that best suits their project and they can modify the solutions when they choose to modify the implementation. Its purpose is to provide developers with the process to fulfill the role of a custom blockchain project.

Security layer: magnetic resonance research

Low cost and high efficiency are the main drivers of Polygon's rapid growth, but this growth would not be possible without Polygon's modular security solutions. “Security-based support” solutions include Polygon's PoS side chain and anti-fraud measures, while new solutions such as Avail and Hermez ZK stacks are in development. . Some of these solutions can be mixed, but they all depend on the Polygon SDK.

SDK Polygone

Polygon's software development kit (SDK) is the basis for projects to start their own EVM-compatible chain. This SDK uses "Security as a Service", allowing developers to choose the best solution for their job.

As seen above, the Polygon framework decouples the work, allowing manufacturers to choose their own design or create their own, while controlling interference with other strings in the Polygon ecosystem.

This integration allows Polygon chains with different solutions to communicate with each other, allowing manufacturers to choose custom solutions. Polygon also plans to expand the approval process, application data, and other additional services.

Hermez polygonal safety (ZK Rollup)

Polygon recently acquired the Hermez stacking solution, ZK. Hermez is developing an EVM equivalent ZK rollup. EVM is a promising two-tier solution designed to make switching devices safer and cheaper at the same time. The ZK rollup compresses the batch of transactions into small files as proof of validity (or zk-SNARK). This information was placed on a chainsaw to verify the authenticity of the evidence. Compared to Ethereum, Hermez has 133 times the export rate and only a tenth of the exchange rate.

This solution eliminates the inconvenience of plasma with a 7 day latency removal as there is no need to test the data with proof of fraud as SNARK proof is considered easy to verify. However, the proof of use model is still included in the effort. The real solutions now demanded by users are still a long way off, and like Avail, ZK-rollup's future looks bright.

female polygon

Polygon also recently announced a new ZK project called Miden, an EVM compatible rollup based on STARK. This project was led by Bobbin Threadbare, the main developer of other ZK technologies, Distaff VM (STARK based virtual machine) and Winterfell (High Performance STARK Validator).

This solution is only based on STARK, supporting all operations and obtaining completion certifications. Miden compiles the Solidity code into Miden Assembly, which the Miden VM uses to market and generate zero identifiers.

Hermez's goal is to achieve the highest EMV (level code). Miden will start with the Solidity compilation, then move on to other languages.

Therefore

The facts prove that Polygon's decision to focus on providing a solution for Ethereum was successful, as the Polygon network exploded throughout 2021. To support this development, Polygon is working hard to create solutions out-of-the-box and competitive security solutions that enable manufacturers to make better use of Polygon to reduce transaction costs and lead times. ZK stacking solutions alone generate over $ 1 billion in revenue, and Polygon has sufficient resources to measure Ethereum and continue to expand its solutions to meet grid load needs in the future.