Vitalik Buterin: Ethereum's Last Challenge

Think of the generic "big blockchain". High block frequency, the block is large, thousands of changes per second, but also very loud. Because the blocks are so big, there are only tens or hundreds. A node can run all the nodes involved. , build blocks or inspect existing chains. How can I create channels like this without resistance to trust and censorship, at least by design?

It is a reasonable way.

In addition to second level loans with lower capital for blockchain decisions. The market in one block is divided into 100 compartments, each based on the Merkle or Verkle tree of the state. Each second staker is randomly assigned to one of the buckets. Blocks are only accepted if a signature of at least 2/3 of the user has been assigned to each bucket.

Evidence of fraud or disclosure of ZK-SNARK,Users can check access blocking directly (inexpensively).. ZK-SNARK can directly access blockchain authentication, fraud proof is a simple solution. If a block has the wrong compartment, that can report evidence of fraud from the compartment. This provides another layer of security in addition to the randomly assigned validators.

Presentation information is included in the template to allow users to identify the content of the block. Using DAS verification, the user can view some optional options to determine whether or not to print.

Add another industry channel to prevent censorship. One way would be to allow second tier lenders to submit a list of businesses that should be included in the next priority.

What do you get after doing all of this?We know anti-censorship is always important, but anti-censorship evidence is unreliable and has serious implications, and anti-censorship magic in particular can prevent manufacturers from censoring.This is aesthetically unsightly, but provides the straightforward guarantee that we are looking for. Even if all the major stakeholders (blockchain developers) want to attack or censor, the worst thing they can do is take Line out altogether. At this point, the chain stops. Accept change until the community engages with resources and forms equitable stakeholders.

Now consider the long-term possibilities of bringing together ...

Just imagine that some concepts like Arbitrum, Optimism, Zksync or something new can be very effective in developing node applications, and if you have a powerful tool you can solve 10,000 problems per second. The art of doing this is well known, and Dan Larimer and others have used it in recent years. Split fully into CPU threads, exploiting cheap different logic and running tons of different threads to run expensive logic. . However, the interface is very good encryption. Consider that Ethereum uses sharding from the data structure and has an average space of 64 shards to store the data aggregated on that chain. As a result, all immigrants to these destinations. How will the world be?

Again, we have a world where block making is paramount, blocking evidence is unreliable and has serious repercussions, and closures remain closed.Cumulative block producers are a difficult industry to integrate because they have to do a lot of business, but they cannot support the bad blocks. The presence of the block is guaranteed by the root chain and access to the block is guaranteed by the merge: if the ZK aggregation is recognized by SNARK, the optimistic aggregation is safe as long as the members honestly present evidence of fraud on the spot. (they were funded with Gitcoin grants.) received). In addition, users can choose to send the changes of the second channel in conjunction with the channel, so that they cannot verify the content of the content.

Now think about another possible long-term future for the assembly.

No content can work properly for most of Ethereum's features. Swap, hundreds of swaps per second all peak. We have many Ethereum summer futures, Cosmos many visions, but this relies on simple procedures that ensure data availability and security sharing. Users often rely on interconnects to move between different channels without having to pay full price for key chains. How will the world be?

Since the content is so important and easy to get started, it looks like you can have it all through justification, strong censorship resistance, decentralized block generation, and more. However, decentralization of block production may not be so secure due to the potential for cross-domain VPDs. The possibility of creating the next block in several places at the same time has many advantages.

Western Gate Cross-Domain SRM Periodic Approval

Thus, in many parts of the world, the same production of regulatory blocks in all areas faces serious constraints. It might not happen, but it probably will, so be prepared for this potential. What can we do about it? The best method we currently know of is to use a combination of the two.

A rollup uses a process to auction blocks in each time slot, or an Ethereum base layer using the Propose / Builder (PBS) separation (or both). This at least ensures that differences in the centralization of block production do not lead to identification of blocks by the product market, which is fully captured and empowered by the elite.

It describes the use of the anti-censorship bypass channel and PBS anti-censorship technology, which are Ethereum's main tools. This ensures that there is a way around the censorship if the ability to perform well winner in the "pure" blockchain industry tries to censor change.

What is the result? Block production is centralized, block evidence is unreliable, highly decentralized, and also resists censorship.

our approach towards the same goal

What does that mean?

There are many ways to create a large and stable blockchain ecosystem for the long term, but they all seem to be heading towards a similar future. It is likely that block making will ultimately be average. The interconnected network of integration, or the network resulting from integrated SRMs, pushes us in this direction in another direction. What we can do, however, is “manage” this industry using process-level processes such as board approval, standards information, and channel bypass to ensure that they never abuse their power.

What does this mean for block producers?Block making will appear to be a specialized business and professionals registered to ignore other disciplines. 90% of Optimism block producers are good Arbitrum block producers, good Polygon block producers, and even good Ethereum base block producers. If you have multiple managers, a competitive advantage can be an important source of income.

What does this mean for Ethereum?First, despite its uncertainty, Ethereum is well suited for the transition to a future world. The vast benefits of the Ethereum-centric roadmap mean that Ethereum is open to any future and inevitably doesn't have to say who wins. Do users need content? Ethereum can become the foundation by providing high volume products that go through the design process and require secure “armor” that is resistant to fraud and censorship. Is building leaders too important to work hard or do users have a high demand for diversity? Ethereum can also be a base layer and is an excellent layer as it allows for easy, safe and inexpensive replacement of assets from a solid foundation based on reliability.

Additionally, Ethereum researchers need to determine the degree of decentralization that can be achieved in blockchain manufacturing. If cross-SRMs (even a cross-shard SRM embedded in multiple shards) are not safe, adding pipes to facilitate decentralized block production may not be necessary. .

What does this mean for Big Blockchain?They are skeptical and have a chance to become something censorship resistant. We will soon see that their main producers and communities have enough protection against censorship and decentralization!

It can take years to accomplish all of this. Partitioning and ranking of models is a very difficult process to implement. It will take many years of improvement and testing for people to keep their assets in the ZK stack running EVM with confidence. Cross-domain MEV research is still in its infancy. However, a bright and bright future for scalable blockchains will emerge.